Appeals to Processes

For anyone reading this in the future, the US is in the midst of a highly contested election. I don’t have the space to go over all the details, but the short version is that Donald Trump appears to be the victim of election fraud, as hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots, all for his opponent Joe Biden, were “discovered” overnight, only in key battleground states and districts controlled by the Democrat party.

This, however, provides a great time to talk about systems, processes, and the appeal to processes as a stand-in for the good.

“Democracy” is something the American left frequently appeal to, along with the global far-left (which is why so many communist states use the word “democratic” in their new-speak self-titling), as if democracy is something that is good itself.

Processes in general are not things which are “good” in and of themselves, but are conditionally good – that is, they are good because they produce the desired results. You judge your exercise routine by how well it improves your fitness and appearance; you wouldn’t pretend that lifting weights is something you should do simply because it is obviously good.

And yet, “democracy” is treated as though it is unquestionably good. In reality, the appeal to the process is just an appeal to selfishness: You should have the power! Also reality: democracies are illusory.

We don’t need to get into the semantics of how we live in a republic, not a democracy. For now, the point is that the “democracy” buzzword refers to a basic system where everyone can vote and every vote counts the same.

Given our election results, we can infer a few things:

  1. We do not, in practical terms, have a functioning democracy
  2. If we did have a functional democracy, the results are not good

We do not have a function democracy (or republic) because we lack the ability to accurately count votes. We don’t have a functional democracy because the voting system is subject to control and manipulation to the benefit of one party, er go it is incapable of representing the will of the people.

If you were to somehow table these, or if we are to pretend that Joe Biden did in fact get hundreds of thousands of mail-in voters to vote for him, and got more votes than his uber-popular predocessor Barak Obama, then the results of the election undermine any conditional good of the election. Joe Biden clearly suffers from alzheimer’s and has a long history of curruption, of which the scandals involving trading his power for the benefit of his son are likely just the tip of the iceberg.

In other words, the voters elected someone who is incapable of holding office both morally and mentally.

The US is not the only accusor of democracy’s failings – just take a look at Venezuela, an oil-rich country that is on the brink of starvation due to the “election” of socialists. Clearly, looking at the outcome of their country, the system must be replaced with something that functions better.

So the appeal to democracy is unsound if you are at all concerned with outcomes.

It is also, however, deeply insincere. Republicans are well known for playing by the rules, and the anger of Trump supporters right now boils down to this assymetry: We won, but you cheated.

Of course, they cheated. They have been cheating for a long, long time, and I don’t just mean having dead people vote from the grave. The American Left has been quite happy to end-run around democracy whenever possible to achieve aims that are in opposition to the will of the majority. Gay marriage was never legalized in California in the traditional sense. Before the legislature could even decide that, California voters passed through direct democracy a constitutional ammendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman, thus making all same-sex relationships automatically fall outside of this boundary.

The law was struck down as unconstitutional by the unelected court, and the state government refused to defend its law, because the politicians (again) don’t respect democracy, and the SCOTUS refused to hear the case because the petitioners (who had spearheaded the ballot initiative) didn’t have standing to sue.

They did the same thing with Abortion, and untold millions have been murdered as a result.

If, somehow, a law is still kept on the books, they will refuse to enforce it. If they cannot get a law on the books, they will enforce it extra-legally. People “guilty” of improper political speech will get fired from their jobs or banned from the platforms they rely upon to make money. It goes on an on.

What the left actually cares about is winning. There is no process that matters, and no rules to a contest that they will respect. The right needs to be realistic about this and stop letting them control the narrative, the courts, and the voting box. At least Trump is willing to fight, not just say that there was nothing to do about a ref that was paid-off, take the loss and walk out of the stadium to boos. As a result there might, just might, be a chance of making the process actually function.

We do not live in a democracy, not just as a matter of semantic truth, but as a matter of practical reality. Stop the theater of pretending we do.


  1. Scipio Americanus

    But Q will save us all, there is a masterplan, Q just needs more time to drain swamp from within. Also, are you on the proscription list from AOC?

    Maybe they just didn´t have to show their hand in the past, Bush vs Gore (Fake Env. Guy) Bush (NeoCon) vs Kerry (both Skull&Bones), Obama (Puppy of the Rich) vs McCain (NeoCon), Obama vs Romney (WS Guy), Potential 2016 Clinton vs Jeb Bush. There isn´t that much difference.

  2. Great entry, articulates what I’ve been thinking. Holding a “process” as an ultimate good in itself is just another idol. The democratic process only works for good when the people, and its wardens share good values, ie. eyes morally upturned towards God’s will. As our culture becomes more secular, moral relativism causes ever shifting values, and “end justifies the means” mentality takes root, the democratic process begins to unravel. What arises in its place is authoritarianism.

    If people who support Biden are okay with (or conveniently ignore) the ballot harvesting because Biden’s ideology aligns with their own values, and are getting the result they want, they will find that same sword turned against them – just like all the former supporters of communists in Russia discovered when they ended up in gulags. “Put not your faith in princes” – or in political processes.

    Perhaps some damage can be averted with some kind of Voter ID license card, like a kind of band-aid. But the real solution is a return to God & truth in a honest way. With that, fair play will return to the news and political arena.

  3. Hi David! Great read. I’m a big fan of your work. I really respect you and your opinions even though I don’t agree with all of them. But that is also what I like when im watching/ reading you.

    From what I can see in America is that democracy and your systems are failing. Media are fake and biased. They dictate too much. But conspiracy theories and fake news like QAnon are equally dangerous and get way too much attention on social media.

    I believe Trump has done alot of good things for America and some bad. I think the portrayal of him in media is unjust most of the time. But he makes it hard for the rest of the world to take him serious with his twitter rants and false information and so on. I honestly don’t care if biden or trump wins. As long as it was a fair and true election, without voter fraud and interfering. The people needs to know their votes and voices are reapected and worth it.

    Sorry if my english is bad.
    I really do appreciate your view and take on everything David. Ive learned alot from you.

    Viewer and reader from Sweden.

  4. You may have already heard about this, but if not, they gave up on pretending there was no conspiracy to steal the election.

    “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. …
    “This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. …
    But it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally. The system didn’t work magically. …
    “That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. …”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.